Elevator (2011) Film Review

 
 

The cover that Netflix uses for this movie is so misleading. It features a woman being dragged into an elevator by some sort of monster. There is no monster. The woman on the cover does not even appear in the movie. Elevator is about nine people that get stuck in an elevator after an insufferable ten-year-old stops it. It is revealed that one of them has a bomb and they must figure out a way to escape. It is not a deep psychological thriller like Netflix claims, but it does manage to hold your attention and it ends up being rather humorous.

Since the premise is so simple, I don’t want to reveal too much. Aside from the intro, the entire movie takes place in an elevator. There are a few things about the setup that left me kind of confused. The movie starts off with people arriving to a party that is at the very top of a 52 story building. Clearly taking an elevator is the only logical way to get there as walking up that many flights of stairs in formal attire would be a nightmare. It sounds like there was going to be a lot of people attending this party as there is someone waiting outside the elevator urging people to wait for it to get full before going up. I would imagine that it would take a few minutes for each trip to be completed for a building that tall so it is understandable that elevator travel be as efficient as possible. An easier solution would have just been to host the party on the ground floor. Other than that there are no plot holes that I found while watching this movie.

What makes Elevator pleasing to watch is the acting. None of the characters are bland or generic and you can feel the tension between them as their futures continue to grow bleaker. I really hope that this is intentional, but it feels like a dark comedy. Some moments are just too absurd for it not to be a dark comedy. Absurd is the perfect word to describe this movie. If you are looking for a crazy movie to watch, Elevatormight be just what you are looking for.

Food, Inc. Film Review

Given that Unwrapped is still airing on Food Network, I would be inclined to believe that people are curious about the origin of the food they eat. Unlike the sugarcoated reality that makes Unwrapped so appealing to watch, Food, Inc. takes a more serious approach that will make you think twice about the food you are eating. This 2008 documentary examines serious issues surrounding modern farming techniques and industrial production of meat and is nicely broken into several segments to prevent it from dragging on.

If meat production was not enough of a hint, I should make it clear that viewers should be prepared to watch footage of animals being slaughtered as well as the cruel conditions animals are being forced to live in. It really is odd seeing chickens collapse because their legs are unable to support their body weight due to irregular growth from being genetically modified. Will watching the treatment of farm animals make you want to consider becoming a vegetarian? Perhaps, but as Food, Inc. goes on to explain, not even vegetables are safe from the changes that have occurred in farming. This can be seen in the number of E. Coli outbreaks within the past 20 or so years. This documentary heavily endorses purchasing food at a farmer’s market as apparently that is practically the only safe place to get it from.

Food, Inc. starts to feel like an advertisement for farmer’s markets by the end of the documentary. Although there is nothing wrong with these places, I feel that it takes away from the well thought out argument that the film is trying to prove. Something needs to be done about the modern state of farming. Is it possible to revert back to old fashion farming techniques without the risk of a low food supply? Can there be more inspections to prevent the outbreak of contaminated food? I suppose that the conditions farm animals live in can also be improved. Maybe I am just being cynical, but how important are living conditions when the animal is just going to end up slaughtered? Food, Inc. was an interesting documentary and should be watched by anyone who eats food.

Best Worst Movie Film Review

I have never watched “Troll 2” and with good reason, many consider it to be the worst movie ever made. “Best Worst Movie” gathers all of the cast members from “Troll 2” to investigate how such a movie even came into existence, or at least that is what the description on Netflix/Amazon states. Instead, this documentary focuses on how the actors and crew members feel about the movie years later and their reactions to the cult phenomenon. It was absolutely fascinating to listen to the actors talk about the confusion and disappointment they felt once they finally had the chance to watch the movie they worked on.

“Best Worst Movie” is directed by Michael Stephenson, who was the child star of “Troll 2”. It was bizarre listening to him explain how his hopes and dreams of being a successful actor were ruined by having any sort of association with this film. Some actors still tried to pursue careers after the film such as Connie Young, who refuses to put “Troll 2” on her resume. The documentary places a lot of focus on George Hardy who seems to be the one of the few cast members living a fulfilling life. While he ended up pursuing a career in dentistry, it was nice knowing that “Troll 2” did not ruin the life of every person who worked on it.

The director of “Troll 2” says that the goal of a movie should be to evoke emotion. I do not trust the advice of someone responsible for creating such a bad movie, but that seems like a worthwhile goal. Seeing the actors going from disappointed to enthusiastic once “Troll 2” became a cult classic, left me feeling happy. “Best Worst Movie” is definitely worth a watch and left me wanting to experience “Troll 2” for myself.

Upside Down Film Review

I stumbled across this movie while trying to find something to watch on Netflix. The premise sounded interesting, a story about a world that has dual gravity. How does dual gravity even work? Well, the movie attempts to create its own set of rules about how there are two twin planets, each with its own opposite gravity. Basically, objects are pulled by the gravity it originates from and will ignite after a certain time. This means that if an object was to cross between worlds, that object would now fall up instead of down. It sounds confusing, but the concept allows for some striking visuals. Unfortunately, Upside Down suffers from confusing storytelling and a lack of consistency between the rules of gravity it creates.

If dual gravity was not unique enough, Upside Down sets itself apart by being a romantic science fiction film. I did not even realize that was a genre. Anyways, the lovers in this film are Adam and Eden, played by Jim Sturgess and Kirsten Dunst respectively. They are from opposite worlds which are simply named Up and Down. They meet as children when they both happen to be walking up a mountain in their own worlds. Adam tries to bring Eden down to his world by using a rope. It works and they have a great time together, until they are caught by other people. For some reason, people from opposite worlds are not allowed to interact with each other and it is a very serious offense to do so. Adam attempts to return Eden to Up but she accidentally falls, causing a puddle of blood to rush from her head.

The film then jumps ahead ten years and we see Eden appearing on a TV show, working for TransWorld. I guess she managed to survive the fall. It did not seem likely that her body would be found in time, considering that she was on the top of what seemed to be an abandoned mountain. Maybe authorities from Adam’s world alerted Up about her body. Anyways, now knowing where Eden can be found, Adam also gets a job at TransWorld. The appearance of TransWorld was confusing at first as the film never made it clear that such a massive building exists. It is the only building that stretches across both worlds. I am still kind of confused as to what TransWorld actually does, but Adam is able to finish working on a face-lift cream that he has been working many years on.

With the help of his co-worker, Bob from Up, Adam is able to meet Eden again. Adam escapes the movie’s rules of gravity through the use of weights obtained from Up. This does not prevent Adam’s clothes from igniting, however and has to retreat back to Down. His clothes catching fire are the least of his worries as Eden suffers from amnesia and has no previous knowledge of Adam’s existence. Through a well-timed dream sequence, Eden suddenly remembers who he is, causing a lot of happiness between the two when they meet again.

Upside Down takes its time in developing the plot until the second half where the plot moves so quickly that the wonder of dual gravity starts to fall apart. Adam becomes a fugitive once people from Up realize that he is from Down. He gets threatened by TransWorld for not telling them the secret ingredient in his face-lift cream. Eden gets arrested for interacting with Adam. Bob gets fired and spends his time at home coming up with a way to cross worlds without weights. He also buys the patent to Adam’s cream. The film did not establish that there was even a patent for it and this line was said in passing, which is weird because it ends up solving one of the biggest problems Adam is experiencing. In the final scene, Eden reveals to Adam that she is pregnant and the film abruptly ends by explaining that the pregnancy changed the world and that people from Up and Down are now allowed to interact with each other.

The ending is so abrupt that it makes the entire movie feel like a joke. There is not a scene in the movie that would imply that Adam could even be the father of the child. How exactly did this child form equality between Up and Down? I don’t think there has been such an important child in film since John Connor from the Terminator series. It is probably the film’s way of trying to include biblical parallels. The movie sure does set itself up for one, I mean, Adam and Eden, it is so obvious.

The laws of gravity that make the movie so intriguing to watch are also ruined. There are inconsistencies throughout the film that make it even harder to understand how the gravity is supposed to work. In one scene while Adam is in Up, his tie starts floating. Unless he was wearing a tie clip, his tie should have always been floating. What about the skirts that Eden wears? You would think that they would be impossible to keep down. Another inconsistency is the drinks that Eden orders from a restaurant in Up. The drink floats up, meaning that it is from the opposite world. Matter from the opposite world eventually catches on fire. I just do not understand how she is able to drink without killing herself or how she was even able to swallow the drink in the first place without choking. I think I might be overthinking it, but if the movie took the time to try and create a logical set of rules, it should at least follow them.

Upside Down tries to do way too much in a span of two hours. The plot becomes too convoluted for its own good and becomes confusing for unnecessary reasons. Despite the amazing idea of dual gravity, I have a hard time recommending it. The visuals are incredible, but are the only worthwhile part of the film. I would suggest just watching the trailer just to get a snippet of the visuals without having to be letdown by the weak story.

Jeff, Who Lives at Home Film Review

Netflix is typically right when it comes to recommending titles that I may possibly enjoy. With a suggested rating of 4.1 stars, I decided to give Jeff, Who Lives at Home a watch. About mid-way through my viewing, I had a strong feeling that this recommendation was wrong. I tried to keep an open mind while watching the film, but I had a hard time connecting with any of the characters.

Unlike the name of the film implies, there is actually very little screen time showing Jeff living at home. At the start of the movie, Jeff is seen in his bathroom, rambling into an audio recorder about his most recent viewing of Signs. He appears to be obsessed with Signs and makes references to it multiple times throughout the film. Immediately, something feels odd about Jeff and it just gets worse as he gets a phone call from his mother who threatens to kick Jeff out if he does not buy the wood glue she asked for. It seems weird that Jeff’s mother would be upset about something as trivial as wood glue. Clearly, she is unhappy with Jeff still living with her, which just made me wonder why she even let it go on for this long in the first place.

The movie just gets stranger from there. His quest for wood glue keeps being put on hold as Jeff becomes distracted with people named Kevin. Eventually, he runs into his brother Pat, played by Ed Helms, and a second plot is created. Pat is concerned that his relationship is falling apart and uses Jeff to help spy on his wife. Nothing is special about this and it is not remotely funny. Another unfunny storyline is created with Jeff’s mother, Sharon, and her secret admirer at work. Sharon talks to her secret admirer using AIM. By this point, the film had lost all credibility to me. The movie tries to unite all of these stories with one of the most forced endings I have witnessed.

Maybe the ending was supposed to be some sort of joke. I guess the comedy just went right over my head. The movie failed to make me laugh. The idea the Jeff, Who Lives at Home is trying to impose, that everything it connected, is made all too clear. The characters were unlikable which in turn made the plot uninteresting. Jeff, who lives at home, should have stayed at home.

 

Jobs Film Review

“Jobs” feels like an incomplete movie. Maybe wanting to see Steve Jobs’ life up until his death was a bit much to ask for from a biographical film about Steve Jobs. By the end of the film I was left puzzled at what it was trying to accomplish. What did “Jobs” do that “Pirates of Silicon Valley” did not already cover much more accurately 13 years ago?

“Pirates of Silicon Valley” is a captivating movie that managed to explain the creation of both Apple and Microsoft and the fierce rivalry that sparked between them in a span of 90 minutes. A two hour theatrical film only focusing on Steve Jobs should be able to cover more history than a made for TV movie. Microsoft is only mentioned once in a scene where Steve is threatening to sue Bill Gates for copying his idea. The historical accuracy of the film is questionable as both companies were actually stealing ideas from Xerox, a company that was not mentioned at all. If “Jobs” is not going to be more historically accurate or expand upon what Steve Jobs did after his return to Apple then it does not really have a reason to exist.

At its very best, viewers will be able to stare at Ashton Kutcher’s amazing hair. Casting Ashton Kutcher as Steve Jobs is a much better decision than casting Topher Grace as Venom in Spider-Man 3. Admittedly, I despise most of Apple’s products, but that should not stop me from enjoying a movie about the company and its creator. It is just that the concept has already been done.

Matilda Film Review

In a twisted world without child protection services and despicable parenting, Matilda is desperate to get revenge on everyone who has wronged her. Well, maybe the story is not that dark. “Matilda” is yet another movie based off a Roald Dahl children’s book. It is a lighthearted book about a girl with a passion for books who is neglected by her parents and abused by her headmistress, Miss Trunchbull at school. The only person to truly recognize Matilda’s special gifts is her teacher, Miss Honey. The film is a bit darker than the book but does a great job of capturing the story.

If there is one thing that the film succeeds at is that it completely captures how intolerable Matilda’s parents and Miss Trunchbull are. The performances are rage-inducing and show how innocent Matilda is. The camera angles are dizzying at times, but give the film a surreal quality, making everything feel like an exaggeration. Every character is over-the-top, especially Miss Trunchbull who tosses a girl by her hair, nearly hits people with darts and even locks Matilda in the “Chokey”, a closet surrounded in nails. At times it is easy to wonder how much further the torture could have gone if the primary audience was not children.

On the opposite side of the spectrum are Matilda and Miss Honey who are the only characters that provide hope. Hope that things can change and that something positive can happen in a truly negative world.

Iron Man 3 Review

The trailers for Iron Man 3 looked fantastic. Then again, I remember having the same excitement for X-Men: The Last Stand. While that movie wasn’t terrible, there were certain aspects that left me disappointed. Still it was a decent way to end the X-Men trilogy. A year later Marvel created even more hype with Spider-Man 3. I absolutely loved the first two films, but this. This was an abomination, a complete disgrace to the Spider-Man trilogy. So I watched Iron Man 3, fearing that it would be another Spider-Man 3 scenario and ended up leaving the theater pleasantly surprised.
I won’t go into detail about the plot but Robert Downey Jr. gives another solid performance as Tony Stark and the action is satisfying to watch. There are a couple of quirks that I noticed during the movie however, but most of them were trivial. There is a critical scene where Tony is confronted by the press but all of my attention was focused on this one reporter who was recording vertical video on a phone. Tony confronts this reporter and destroys the phone. While he ends up destroying the phone for a completely different reason it felt like justice was served. No one, not even journalists have the right to record vertical videos.

Another quirk and my biggest complaint about Iron Man 3: Why is it a summer blockbuster? Money I suppose, but it would have made much more sense to release it during November. The movie makes it quite clear, multiple times, that it takes place during Christmas. Maybe I’m just being nitpicky.

As a Christmas film, Iron Man 3 is one of the best. Although it is not perfect it does its part in creating an exciting trilogy.

Pitch Perfect Movie Review

Well, I finally got around to watching Pitch Perfect. Maybe it is a movie that gets better with repeated viewings, but I do not see what is so special about it. The characters were unlikable and Aubrey, the leader of this supposed aca-mazing group holds the entire movie back, forcing the audience to sit through a horrid arrangement of songs featuring such classic hits as “The Sign” and “Turn the Beat Around”. It just brings back thoughts of a mediocre episode of Full House and an I Can’t Believe It’s Not Butter commercial. This is rather disappointing when the cast is so talented and this talent is only showcased for just a few short moments towards the end of the film when it finally attempts an original remix. Pitch Perfect just left me wanting to watch the Breakfast Club. Actually, do that, watch the Breakfast Club instead.

Tapped Film Review

A documentary about bottled water, it sounds simple enough.  Then you realize there are more issues with these bottles than just recycling.  You will quickly become thirsty, and have second thoughts about reaching over for your bottle of water.  Is this documentary convincing enough to stop you from using water bottles?  Maybe, but the information presented here is interesting, and at the very least you will learn how most companies get the water required to fill all of the bottles.
The effects used to present maps and statistics are nice.  With a movie about water, I would have expected the color scheme of these parts of the documentary to be in various shades of blue instead of relying on oranges and yellows.
The documentary mentions that if consumer habits continue the way they are today, then our water supply will be depleted.  It is not a stretch to say that this will happen.  The problem lies with how this idea is expressed, which is by mentioning droughts throughout the United States.  While it is a problem, it would have been interesting to see how our water usage affects the entire world, especially in locations which do not have easy access to clean sources of water.

Frightening statistics about the amount of plastic in samples of ocean water show the damaging effects that bottled water have for our health.  As one of the major issues being addressed in this documentary, a thorough job was done showing the various aspects that water bottles have on people’s health.  
Did this documentary make me change my water drinking habits?  No, they are too convenient.  Would I consider using a reusable bottle?  Perhaps, but that would assume I want to drink water at any moment of the day.  It was interesting, even if it was a bit more serious than I was expecting.  It only begs to ask what other common everyday items have such a huge impact on environmental health.